Conference Call Saturday, Jan. 12th (2pm EST)

This Saturday's Conference Call will address our new plan for the state of Texas.  The very first Wolf PAC resolution has been filed in the Texas House of Representatives.  Cenk will be on the call with us, we're going to need everyone from all over the country on this!  2pm Eastern Time.  RSVP to get a reminder email Saturday morning. 

Call in number: (559) 726-1300

Code: 295785

January 12, 2013 at 2pm - 3pm EST 


January 12, 2013 at 2pm
Your Phone

Will you come?

Showing 150 reactions

rsvped +1 2013-01-19 13:51:24 -0500
rsvped 2013-01-17 11:32:16 -0500
rsvped 2013-01-12 15:39:35 -0500
commented 2013-01-12 15:39:14 -0500 · Flag
I strongly agree with Steve Needles’ comment below. Where can we find the report from the constitutional lawyers naming W-P’s language the best? Such substantial support would do a lot to convince local reps that our amendment is the most likely to succeed. This report also speaks volumes on the level of due diligence behind W-P and Co. Nice work! Plus I’m curious to read it myself…
commented 2013-01-12 15:21:51 -0500 · Flag
MtA asks Congress to propose an Amendment. Wolf PAC doesn’t think Congress will do that just because we ask nicely. So, like the 17th Amendment effort, we’re calling for a Convention to propose the Amendment. Most likely, if we get close, Congress will propose it themselves. We support both efforts, but we don’t think MtA will be successful without following it up with Wolf PAC.

Either way, you have the same safeguard of needing 38 States to ratify. The difference is in the method of proposal only.
commented 2013-01-12 15:07:18 -0500 · Flag
Ok. I will try to contact state reps in my area to get their opining on the issue.

Btw. What is the main difference between Wolf Pac and Move to Amend?
commented 2013-01-12 15:04:32 -0500 · Flag
Should we start with senators, or representatives, or does it matter?
commented 2013-01-12 15:04:01 -0500 · Flag
AJR 22 passed. That was a Move to Amend style resolution. AJR 32 was a Wolf-PAC style resolution, but not sponsored by us, and it came out when we were in our infancy. That died in committee. We’ll be bringing that idea back in California as soon as we can and when it comes back, it will have the full support of Wolf PAC.
commented 2013-01-12 15:00:57 -0500 · Flag
Another quick question, what happened to AJR 22 in California. I think it passed in the house so now what?
commented 2013-01-12 15:00:25 -0500 · Flag
I’m in IL
commented 2013-01-12 14:54:17 -0500 · Flag
Thanks, Samuel I’ll check those out right now while you guys are talking =D
commented 2013-01-12 14:53:37 -0500 · Flag
Anyone here in IL?
commented 2013-01-12 14:53:26 -0500 · Flag
We don’t have an update on California at this time. For now, call your reps and look for support. If you want to talk in more detail, e-mail and he can help you connect with other California members.
commented 2013-01-12 14:50:25 -0500 · Flag
Can you address politics here in California?
commented 2013-01-12 14:49:53 -0500 · Flag
No one you know: There are several good resources for that. and are both very useful.
commented 2013-01-12 14:44:58 -0500 · Flag
I have one request. I think Cenk’s comment about the group of constitutional lawyers agreeing that Wolf PACs resolution was the best way to get money out of politics is a very powerful comment on the validity of our agenda. I hadn’t heard this before, and I think it would be a very powerful statement to present to legislators to get them on board with us. Could Cenk put something up on the Wolf-PAC site with details about this, or if there is already something written up about this, could he direct us to where it is so we can get details correct on this?
commented 2013-01-12 14:35:26 -0500 · Flag
Is there a good resource for looking into one’s state legislators (mine is VA) to see what drives them, their voting records, time in service etc? I’d think someone who’s been around a while and seen the change Cit. United caused, but who is a populist, would be a good choice. No?
followed this page 2013-01-12 14:13:47 -0500
rsvped 2013-01-12 14:12:27 -0500
commented 2013-01-12 14:07:55 -0500 · Flag
That’s great, Tim. We’ll address the issue and Mike, who is in New Hampshire, will definitely follow up with you.
commented 2013-01-12 14:07:06 -0500 · Flag
(I’m on the call btw)
commented 2013-01-12 14:06:41 -0500 · Flag
I’m curious if, and how, the Texas resolution (the language of it) was crafted, and pitalls to avoid. I’m a state legislator in New Hampshire and would like to get the ball rolling here in the granite state.
commented 2013-01-12 14:06:32 -0500 · Flag
We can’t unmute individual people in this system. You can ask questions here or at the facebook page.
commented 2013-01-12 14:04:01 -0500 · Flag
Ben – Vermont will be covered on the call for sure.
rsvped 2013-01-12 14:03:33 -0500
commented 2013-01-12 14:03:02 -0500 · Flag
Hey Mike can I be unmuted?
commented 2013-01-12 14:01:06 -0500 · Flag
Please address action in the state of Vermont, if you can. Thank you!
rsvped 2013-01-12 13:07:35 -0500
rsvped 2013-01-12 13:00:57 -0500
posted about this on Facebook 2013-01-12 12:58:45 -0500
Please RSVP: Conference Call Jan. 12
1  2  3  4  5  Next →

We need your help,
you can signup with:

Get Involved Anytime:

Our Pack


(@progressiveusa) is following @WolfPAChq on Twitter
(@progressiveusa) is following @WolfPAChq on Twitter
(@newdjs1) is following @WolfPAChq on Twitter
(@mtackett111) is following @WolfPAChq on Twitter
(@mtackett111) is following @WolfPAChq on Twitter
(@MorkyMorke) is following @WolfPAChq on Twitter

View All